ROUND_16 · SEPANG
Bahrain GP in Malaysia 2026simulated 400 times
We ran the race 400 times through our engine, starting from the real qualifying grid. This is what came out.
Favourite
Max Verstappen 23.5%
Wins 23.5% of the simulations and finishes on the podium in 56%. Starts P1.
Driver by driver
| Grid | Driver | Win | Podium | Avg. finish |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Max Verstappen | 23.5% | 56% | P4 |
| P2 | Lewis Hamilton | 16.5% | 49.8% | P4.1 |
| P3 | Kimi Antonelli | 18.5% | 48.8% | P4.1 |
| P4 | Charles Leclerc | 12.5% | 43% | P4.4 |
| P5 | Lando Norris | 12.3% | 37.5% | P4.5 |
| P6 | Oscar Piastri | 8.8% | 34.5% | P4.7 |
| P7 | George Russell | 8% | 30.3% | P5.2 |
| P8 | Isack Hadjar | 0% | 0.3% | P8.6 |
| P9 | Pierre Gasly | 0% | 0% | P12.1 |
| P10 | Gabriel Bortoleto | 0% | 0% | P14.6 |
| P11 | Liam Lawson | 0% | 0% | P11 |
| P12 | Fernando Alonso | 0% | 0% | P11.4 |
| P13 | Carlos Sainz | 0% | 0% | P12.6 |
| P14 | Lance Stroll | 0% | 0% | P17.9 |
| P15 | Nico Hulkenberg | 0% | 0% | P15.4 |
| P16 | Oliver Bearman | 0% | 0% | P15.1 |
| P17 | Esteban Ocon | 0% | 0% | P16.1 |
| P18 | Alexander Albon | 0% | 0% | P16.1 |
| P19 | Valtteri Bottas | 0% | 0% | P18.6 |
| P20 | Sergio Perez | 0% | 0% | P18.2 |
| P21 | Franco Colapinto | 0% | 0% | P16.6 |
| P22 | Arvid Lindblad | 0% | 0% | P16.2 |
Opinion · our reading
Verstappen starts on pole and wins only one race in four, and Hadjar misses the podium in the same car
The starting column is the GRID, and it already includes three penalties applied to the qualifying order. Isack Hadjar qualified third and starts eighth for his seventh internal combustion engine. Franco Colapinto qualified fifteenth and starts twenty-first: he carried five places over from Baku, where he caused the crash with Gasly and Norris, and adds ten for a fifth engine. Arvid Lindblad, with a new engine, turbo and exhaust, starts last. Hamilton and Stroll were called by the stewards, but both got away with a warning and keep their places.
Max Verstappen has pole and the model gives him a 23.5% chance of winning: he is the favourite, yet wins fewer than one race in four. Sepang is one of the circuits where starting position counts least in our engine (third among those measured, behind Las Vegas and Paul Ricard), the exact opposite of Baku last week. That is why Kimi Antonelli, starting third, gets 18.5% and finishes ahead of Lewis Hamilton, who starts second on 16.5%: what matters here is race pace, not grid slot.
All the wins go to the top seven: no one else wins a single time in 400 races. The odd case is Isack Hadjar, who has the same car as the pole-sitter and never wins, with a podium in just 0.3% of races. This is where we think the model may be wrong: it sees much less pace in him than in his team-mate, and starting eighth in a Red Bull that is quick here, a podium would be less unusual than the table suggests. Further back, Lindblad and Colapinto, starting at the back, finish around sixteenth on average.
How the model works
The engine accounts for how much starting at the front is worth at each circuit, and nowhere is it worth as much as at Monaco. Since the 2026 Azerbaijan GP that weight is calibrated track by track against the real races from 2014 to 2025; earlier previews ran on a simpler formula that derived it from how easy it is to overtake on each layout. Which is why Max Verstappen comes out favourite at 23.5% without having the fastest car of the season.
A favourite who only wins one race in four is not a broken model: that is what a real Grand Prix looks like. A retirement, a safety car at the wrong moment or a slow stop flips the result, and the engine simulates all of them. That is why 7 drivers have a genuine shot rather than a single name circled in red.
The most interesting column is the average finish: Arvid Lindblad starts P22 and averages P16.2, the biggest gain on the grid: the driver the model thinks is most underrated by where he qualified.
The numbers come from 400 full race simulations (56 laps) with car and driver ratings updated to this point of the season. This is not betting advice and not an official prediction: it is what our model said. Tomorrow anyone can check whether it was right.